The Influence of Affective Commitment and Trust on Knowledge Sharing In Malaysian Universities. A Comparison between Public and Private Universities

Abstract:

Knowledge resides within a human being and it is hard to be transferred to others. Unwillingness to share is one of the main impediments of knowledge sharing. In a university setting, this situation could be more alarming as universities are knowledge centric organisation. Knowledge sharing will help universities to strengthen its research and teaching activities. Despite the importance of knowledge sharing, many academics still hoard their knowledge. Researchers have argued that the willingness to share knowledge relies heavily on each individual. Based on literature review, there are many factors that influence knowledge sharing behavior, such as extrinsic motivation, social norms, trust, organization policies and procedures are among the few crucial ones. However, very little emphasis has been given to examine the emotional influence towards knowledge sharing.

The study of emotional influence is crucial as it affects one’s intention to share his or her knowledge in the university. The authors proposed that the emotional component includes the evaluation of affective trust among colleagues and also affective commitment towards the university. To date, very little empirical research has been conducted to examine the emotional influence over knowledge sharing intention, especially in the education sector in Malaysia. As such, the aims for this paper are (1) to evaluate the influence of these two emotional factors towards knowledge sharing intention; (2) to examine whether the perception of knowledge sharing in public universities differs from private universities. The research model includes the theory of planned behavior (TPB) and the two affective components.

In order to examine the research model, a survey was conducted with a total respondent of 545 academics from 30 universities in Malaysia. Multiple linear regression was used to examine the research model. On the other hand, t-test was used to examine the differences between public and private universities. In general, the findings revealed that emotional influence is crucial for knowledge sharing behaviour. However, when further analysis was conducted, affect-based trust did not play an important role in affecting knowledge sharing intention in private universities. Furthermore, the t-test analysis shows that there are significant differences between public and private universities.

This paper contributes to the existing literature by evaluating the impact of emotional factors (affective commitment and affective trust) towards knowledge sharing behaviour. It also provides a greater depth of understanding on how knowledge sharing in public universities deviate from private universities. University administrators need to implement policies and activities to strengthen the emotional bonding between academics in order to facilitate knowledge sharing in Malaysian universities. This is exceptionally crucial for private universities as the results shows that knowledge sharing intention is lower than the public universities.

nsdlogo2016